Crosscult Lecture Notes (Lectures 8-12)
LECTURE
EIGHT
Intercultural Relationships
Business and Social Customs:
Migrant
= An individual who leaves the primary cultural contexts in which he/she was
raised in and moves to a new cultural context for an extended period.
Types
of Migrant Groups
1.
Voluntary –
SOLJOURNERS vs IMMIGRANTS
Soljourners
= Travellers who move into new cultural contexts for a limited period of time
and a specific purpose.
(eg in 2011 when floods in Thailand caused
Japanese companies to allow their Thai workers to move to Japan to work there
for the time being)
Immigrants
= People who voluntarily leave one country to settle in another. Many migrate
for political, economic or social reasons.
(eg
in 2010 when the USA reported that more people were migrating to India to find
jobs. Basically, migrating = buh-bye,
bitches, I’m out, I’m heading where the grass is greener)
2.
Involuntary
– LONG-TERM vs SHORT-TERM
Long-Term
= People who are often forced to relocate permanently due to war, famine or
oppression (think of the Rwanda refugees).
Short-Term
= Domestic refugees who are forced to temporarily relocate due to natural
disasters (like tsunami refugees).
NOTE: Immigrants can be
simultaneously accepted and rejected, as well as privileged and disadvantaged.
{CHIM BUT TRUE OKAY}
Migrant-Host
Relationships
1.
Assimilation
= When migrants value the host culture more than their own.
-
The
individual doesn’t want to maintain an isolated identity, but wants to maintain
relationships with other groups in the new culture
-
Central
focus not on retaining one’s cultural heritage
-
When
dominant group forces assimilation, it often entails the migrant giving up or
losing many aspects of the original culture
2.
Separation
= When migrants value their own culture more than the host culture.
-
Migrants may
choose to retain their original culture and avoid interaction with other groups
(like how the Amish avoid interaction with other cultures)
-
Segregation
will happen when separation is initiated or enforced by the dominant society,
sometimes even by legislation (like how the African-Americans used to be
discriminated against)
3.
Integration
= When migrants value both their own and the host culture.
-
They’re
interested in maintaining their own culture as well as having daily
interactions with other groups
-
Involves a
greater interest in maintaining one’s own cultural identity (different from
assimilation!)
-
Migrants
resist assimilation in other ways (like choosing to speak their native language
at home while speaking the local language outside, or eating their native food
at home while also trying the local food outside)
-
Successful
integration also depends on the willingness of the dominant society to accept
the cultures of others!
RESISTING INTEGRATION:
Refusing to consume popular culture products, rejecting the fashion of the host
country etc.
4.
Marginalisation
= When migrants value neither their own nor the host culture.
-
The individual
or group expresses little interest in maintaining cultural ties with either the
dominant or migrant culture (so sad!)
-
Individuals
who live on the margin of a culture cannot participate fully in the political
and social scene due to cultural differences (eg war brides, who don’t have
anyone to connect with, and can’t talk much to the locals due to the cultural
differences)
5.
Cultural
Hybridity = Allows for the fact that
migrant experiences do not necessarily fit neatly into the four houses.
-
Takes into
consideration the host culture’s reception towards migrants and the fact that
migrants shift from one type to another depending on the context (social
separation, economic assimilation, linguistic integration)
Culture
Shock = A relatively short-term
feeling of disorientation or discomfort due to the lack of familiar cues in the
environment.
Criteria for culture shock:
There MUST be cultural contact, since migrants who choose to keep their
distance from the host culture are less likely to experience culture shock.
Symptoms
of Cultural Shock
-
Physiological
(headaches, nausea)
-
Emotional
(irritability, increased anxiety)
-
Communicational
(withdrawal from relationships and conversations, excessive complaining)
Stages
of Cultural Adaptation
1.
Pre-departure:
Optimism/Excitement
2.
Stage
One: Everything is Beautiful
-
Honeymoon
stage
-
Excitement,
pleasure and self-satisfaction; Excitement and curiosity overcome minor
discomforts (who cares if I’m cold, starving and without a roof over my head –
I’m in JAPAN!!! Whoohoo!~!!)
3.
Stage
Two: Everything is Awful
-
Anxiety
begins, restlessness, disappointment
-
Increased
difficulty in communication
-
Marked by a
loss of social cues and a time of inconvenience
-
Physical,
mental and emotional symptoms
-
Duration may
vary (weeks, months… It may even be permanent)
Coping Strategies
1.
Fight:
Scoff at the host country (my country is better than yours!)
-
Looking down
on the host country’s culture; ethnocentric acting
-
Destruction
of the host country’s property (may lead to legal difficulties)
-
Symptoms:
excessive irritation, angry outbursts, defensiveness and frustration over minor
things
2.
Flight:
The removal of thyself from the culture of the host country(or even the removal
of oneself from the country itself)
-
Symptoms:
Nervousness, depression, alcoholism etc
3.
Filter:
Denial of reality
-
Denial of
differences between migrants and people in the host culture
-
Glorification
of home culture, remembering only the good things and glossing over the bad
-
Going native
by totally rejecting the old culture (their own culture) and adopting the host
culture (this doesn’t work cos the migrant is never 100% accepted into society)
4.
Flex:
A more positive phase when the migrant tries new things and starts observing
the new culture that he/she is in. Basically starting to adapt to the new
culture.
-
Eventually
leads to the “Everything is OK” stage
4.
Stage
Three: Everything is OK
-
Migrant has
a more balanced view of the positive and negative sides of the host culture,
and does not feel a need to protect himself/herself
-
Increased
contact with host nationals and less confusion and uncertainty
-
More
accustomed to the food, sights, smells, sounds and nonverbal behaviours of the
host culture
5.
Stage
Four: Acceptance/Adaptation
-
Migrant
feels at home in the new culture and feels comfortable in social situations
-
Increased
involvement in activities and cultivation of friendships
-
Adaptation
to the host culture’s style of doing things (let’s assume that the migrant has
also learned the language of the host country)
6.
U-Curve
(Entry Cycle)
-
3-stage
process in cultural adaptation
7.
W-Curve
(Entry-Re-Entry Cycle)
-
When the
migrant returns to his/her cultural context and encounters re-entry shock (they
experience culture shock again cos the culture of their home country differs
from that of the host country, which the migrant has already gotten accustomed
to)
8.
Final
Stage: Re-entry Shock
-
Experienced
on returning to the home country
-
Now your HOME country feels like a HOST
country (jeng jeng jeng!)
-
For example,
I go to Canada and experience cultural shock (the weather, food, people,
environment in general are all different), and it may take a while for me to
get used to the country. Let’s say that I return to Singapore after maybe 2
years. BAM, cultural shock because the weather, the food, the people are all
different from that in Canada, which I have already gotten used to. Therefore,
I experience cultural shock AGAIN and need to accustom myself to an environment
that feels new to me AGAIN.
How
to Adapt to a New Culture
Long-term
Cultural Adaptation = Long-term
acculturation/adaptation to new cultural behaviours that are different from
one’s primary learned culture. (Takes place after the early adaptation
experience of culture shock, involves a new socialisation/learning process)
Factors contributing to
adaptation process:
-
need for
survival skills
-
assumption
that attitudes and behaviours will ultimately change
The Stress-Adaptation-Growth Model
Basically explains that adaptation is an accumulative but
progressive series of positive/negative experiences.
(Don’t bother so much about
the model; it’s just there to make the notes look more professional lololol)
How
to Alleviate Culture Shock in a Business Situation
-
Carefully
select your personnel for overseas assignments. {Don’t choose someone who’s likely to collapse and have a nervous
breakdown if he/she can’t get used to the new environment!}
-
Provide
pre-departure training for the host country. Basically teach the staff how to
act in the host country, what to do and what to avoid. {May also help to prevent potentially awkward moments and opportunities
for WWIII between countries.}
-
Provide
feedback and rewards. FEEDBACK what is good/what can be done better and REWARD
those who can follow the instructions properly and adapt to the host culture.
-
Develop
employees to their maximum potential. {Wait,
wasn’t this on the company’s mission and vision board…?}
Intercultural
Training
May be provided for the
employees so they do not experience so much cultural shock when in the host
country.
1.
Intellectual
Model.
Give them
facts about the host country.
2.
Area
Training Model
Conduct
field trips {TWCT reference: You cow is
it?}.
3.
Self-Awareness
Model
Have them
role-play some scenarios that they may encounter while in the host country.
4.
Cultural
Awareness Model
Have the
employees recognise their own values in contrast to other cultures.
5.
Interaction
Model
Perhaps you
could have a guest from the host country to come in and speak to the employees
about the country, and the employees could ask questions (not stupid ones,
hopefully) and learn more about the host country.
6.
Multidimensional
Approach
All the
models coming together.
LECTURE
NINE
Intercultural Relationships
ü More
knowledge acquired about the world (specific information about unfamiliar
cultural patterns/languages learnt)
ü One
close intercultural relationship makes it easier to form another
ü Stereotypes
are broken
ü New
skills are acquired (eg learning how to cook their traditional food or playing
their sports)
ü Sense
of connectedness with others and the ability to establish a lifelong pattern of
communication across differences
û Negative
stereotyping
û Overcoming
initial anxiety (such anxiety is usually greater in intercultural relationships
and arises from concern about possible negative consequences)
û More
work needs to be done to keep intercultural relationships going due to 3
aspects:
1.
Need to
explain to ourselves
2.
Need to
explain to each other
3.
Need to
explain to communities
(What’s your motive for this
relationship? Mutual benefit or because you genuinely like them?)
Stereotyping
= A way of categorising and processing information (detrimental when negative
and held rigidly – they become an “intellectual prison”)
Biggest obstacle to
intercultural relationships: MAJORITY COMMUNITIES.
-
The majority
has the most to gain by maintaining social inequality, so they are less likely
to initiate intercultural relationships
-
The minority
has more to gain by initiating intercultural relationships, so they are more
motivated to have them
Cultural
Differences in Notions of Friendship
Related to ideas about
identity and values
Individualist:
Friendship is voluntary and
spontaneous
Collectivist:
Friendships may include obligations (so some may take a longer or shorter time
to call someone a “friend”)
Asian
Views on Friendship
“Friends” vs “Acquaintances”
Guanxi:
Trust, partnership. A social connection built on shared identities such as
kinship or a native place.
-
may not mean
friendship per se, but a friendship with implications of continued exchange of
favours
Ganqing
= Feelings. Refers to a sense of interdependency in a relationship.
Renqing
= Favour. A mechanism that regulates personal relationships and goodwill.
Mianzi
= “Face”. A person’s public image and reputation; Prestige.
Such concepts may not be
understood by a person from a more individualistic culture. For example, an
American may think that it’s not right for people to act this way, but to a
Chinese, it’s an unspoken logic.
Stages
in Relational Development
1.
Initial
Attraction
Relationships
are formed due to:
-
Circumstances
(like working on a project together)
-
Proximity
(like falling for your neighbour)
-
Physical
attraction (may be culturally based)
-
Similarity
(same interests, attitudes, personality traits)
-
Dissimilarity
(ever heard of opposites attract?)
2.
Orientation
Phase
The
individuals learn to adjust and align themselves to the new relationship, and
learn the dos and don’ts about the other’s culture.
3.
Exploratory
Phase
-
Different
cultural rules govern how to regard strangers (with hostility or friendliness)
-
Differences
may be due to different cultural patterns, like a preference for high or
low-context communication
4.
Stability
Phase
Friendships
= Intimacy = Sharing more private/personal information.
Self-disclosure
can be modelled as three concentric circles representing three areas of information
we share with others:
1.
Outer
boundary (superficial information)
2.
Middle (more
personal information)
3.
Inner core
(private information)
Communication
in Intercultural Relationships
-
finding
similarity in your relationships that transcend the cultural differences
-
making time
and getting involved (shared friendship networks)
-
self-disclosure
(the placement of trust) as a turning point of understanding
Intercultural
Work Relationships
-
most
diversity encountered at work, so it’s important to understand this diversity
-
diverse
workforce an advantage in global economy (because it means that you can adapt
to different cultures more easily as compared to someone who has never worked
with someone from a different culture)
-
the
challenge is getting along with people from different cultures (your
ideas/personalities/attitudes may clash)
Intercultural
Relationships Online
Implications of
computer-mediated communication (CMC) in facilitating OR hindering
intercultural relationships.
-
no line of
sight data (no way of verification – is the person you’re talking to really 19
or 59? How do you really know?)
-
language (eg
one may speak Mandarin and one may speak Spanish, but it’s possible to also use
the internet as help)
-
communication
styles (high/low-context communication styles; how you speak may be different
from how he/she speaks too)
Intercultural
Dating
-
social
context and past experiences are a strong influence on whether young people
date interculturally
-
family
attitudes play a big role (if you come from an intercultural family, you’re
more likely to be open to the idea of intercultural dating, as compared to
someone who comes from a family where everyone is from the same culture)
-
geographical
data (compare China and Singapore – in which country is intercultural dating
more likely to happen?)
Intercultural
Marriage Problems
1.
The
Romeo-and-Juliet Effect: Intense
feelings of attraction because family prejudices essentially deny the couple’s
blessing for marriage.
2.
Role:
Wives may feel pressured into accepting their husband’s culture.
3.
Extended
Family Intrusion: Like nosy aunties at
CNY gatherings.
4.
Collectivistic
vs Individualistic Cultures: ‘nuff
said.
5.
Language
and Misunderstanding: Which
language is going to be used at home?
6.
Conflict
Management Styles: Some
cultures prefer to bottle things up while some others may prefer to just say
what they think. This leads to MAJOR clashing.
7.
Child-rearing
Attitudes and Practices: Perhaps
the mother comes from a culture that heavily emphasises obedience in children,
whereas the father may be from a culture that is more lenient when it comes to
raising children.
8.
Expectations
from the Community/Pressure from Society in General:
Because society will judge you either way.
Most Common Issues in
Intercultural Marriages
-
Values
-
Eating/Drinking
and Habits (eg time of eating – early or late, style of eating – hands of
chopsticks or knives and forks etc)
-
Gender roles
(who is to be the more dominant one in the household?)
-
Attitudes
regarding time, religion, place of residence, stress and ethnocentricism
Interaction
Styles in Husband-Wife Relationship
Submission
= One-way adjustment. One partner submits to the culture of the other partner,
abandoning/denying his or her own. Difficult since it is both difficult and
unfair for one person to completely abandon his or her culture.
Compromise
= Each party gives up some of his or her own culturally-bound habits and
beliefs to accommodate the other person. This involves both parties sacrificing
things that are important to them. The question is, what do you sacrifice and
what do you keep?
Obliteration
= Creative adjustment. Both partners deal with differences by attempting to
erase their individual cultures and forming their own. Normally attempted by
people in a whole new environment. Not a viable long-term solution as it is
difficult for people to completely cut themselves off.
Consensus
= Mixing adjustment. A win-win adjustment based on agreement and negotiation.
Requires flexibility from both parties to create a 3rd culture.
Exhausting but rewarding!
LECTURE
TEN (10A – Influence of Media on Intercultural Communication)
Basically, media has created
a world of information and change.
INFORMATION: eg the Newtown
shooting or the Japan earthquake/tsunami.
CHANGE: eg people used to get
married before moving out and finding their own crib, but not anymore.
Media
Effects Theories
Hypodermic
Needle Theory = Classic mass media
theory that information from the media can have a relatively direct effect on a
mass audience, who are also considered to play a somewhat passive role in
information processing.
Minimalist
Effects Theory = Whatever effects the
media may have on its audiences are mediated therefore limited by factors. (eg
the people around you may affect your opinions on a topic)
Cumulative
Effects Theory = Nobody can escape the
media’s influence or its messages, hence dominant view can snowball through the
media. (usually over time, hence the word CUMULATIVE)
Media also focuses the
audience’s attention on what is culturally important to think and talk about,
but this may lead to AGENDA-SETTING.
Media presents culture in
three ways:
1.
It directs
the people’s attention towards codes of acceptable behaviour within society and
how to talk about them. What’s allowed or disallowed within society? Media
creates CHANGE. (eg the NKF saga – thanks to the media’s coverage, people were
aware of the situation and thus hesitant to donate to the fund)
2.
Tells people
what and who counts in the world (like you’d be more likely to know who the
pope is as compared to some random person on the street).
3.
Helps people
understand themselves and their connection with/disconnection from others. (eg
people felt for the rape victim who came to Singapore for medical aid – there
was a connection that was established between the subject and the media’s
audience)
But between exposure (towards
media) and effect (that the media has on audiences), there are other variables
like:
-
interpersonal
networks
-
cultural
norms
-
values and
world views
-
governments/leaders
Variables
Between Exposure and Effect
-
Demographic
Categories (age, occupation, ethnicity etc)
-
Group
Memberships (which group do you belong to?)
-
Motivation,
needs and salient (key) means of gratifying those needs
-
Personality
Characteristics
How
the Media Influences Us
1.
It
Creates Awareness.
Through
direct information about an event or idea’s existence (eg news, sports,
political changes etc. Like the Superbowl – you are aware of this event’s
existence)
2.
It
Sets Agendas.
It calls
attention to what is salient (key to what they want you to think), so people
then talk about what is in the news. However, agenda-setting can also neglect
other issues/concerns, especially for developing nations who experience less
access to world media sources. (Since the media sets the news, it kind of
“plans” what the people are exposed to)
3.
It
Accelerates Changes.
It
influences the people’s perception towards things and causes a change of
behaviour and attitude.
4.
It
Stimulates Rumours.
Details are
often omitted in news broadcasts (eg did the boy bring a KNIFE or a CHOPPER to
school? A bit of information can make a huge difference!), which can lead to
ambiguity and vagueness.
5.
It
Can Become An Addiction.
It may lead
to obsessive compulsion, like addictions to games and chatrooms etc.
6.
It
Can Be A Source of Violence.
It can
predispose (cause tendencies towards) some adults and children towards violence
through direct persuasion or triggering predisposition towards violence into
action.
7.
It
Can Create Effects, Though Not Necessarily Deliberately.
Media
presentations that are not intentionally trying to persuade an audience may
have a greater effect. (eg Harry Potter)
How
the Media Influences Culture
1.
It
can perpetuate stereotypes regarding childbirth, sexuality, religion, war etc.
That’s why
socially-conscious media is trying to eliminate media stereotyping!
2.
Cultural
learning.
George
Gerbner’s cultivation hypothesis – the more a person is exposed to a
construction of reality, the more it is believed. Repeated exposure can
cultivate an indirect, cumulative set of beliefs and ideals.
3.
Creations
of consumer and entertainment needs.
It can solve
audience needs as a form of escapism and emotional release, as well as create a
motivation to buy new technology and other consumer products. Media may satisfy
different social and emotional needs at different times in different ways (the
users and gratification theory). For example, you may have an iPhone 4, but you
may be convinced by the media to get an iPhone 5.
4.
Ethnic
identification.
Media
exposure may facilitate and potentially influence ethnic identification in
positive ways. It influences that label that an ethnic group may adopt, and
audiences may grow to identify with a particular ethnic group, leading to an
enhancement in ethnic identity.
Media
and International Communication
ü Possibility
of global village.
û Problems
with technical sophistication of media scope and quality.
-
technical
innovation fractures the mass audience, splitting them into their specialised
interests, so the media has become the way each one can participate in information
to foster one’s specialised interests, which creates DISUNITY more than UNITY.
-
globalisation
of information (North-South flow hypothesis - the same media that informs
globally can also dominate globally)
-
cultural
imperialism/media hegemony (media can colonise the thinking and values of a
society)
ü Growth
in media content originating in other countries and targeting the USA, as well
as Western media products adapting to local culture.
-
in the
original Spiderman comics, the main character wore tight-fitting costumes, but
when the idea was sold to India, they changed the character’s costume to fit
the culture and its values.
-
although
Hollywood is globally recognised, other players like Bollywood are emerging and
gaining recognition too.
What
We Need to Do
-
stay tuned
to current events
-
be aware of
the effects that the media may have on personal perceptions, and the
positive/negative stereotypes that may arise from prolonged exposure to the
media
-
be aware of
the positive value of the media (they can open us up to new ideas and current
events, and such positive learning can improve our understanding of the culture
-
use the
media as a tool for understanding one view of culture
LECTURE
TEN (10B – Global Etiquette)
Etiquette
= Manners and behaviour considered acceptable in social and business
situations.
Protocol
= Customs and regulations dealing with diplomatic etiquette and courtesies
expected in official dealings with people in various cultures, often associated
with power and status.
The
Many Branches of Global Etiquette
1.
Business
Card Exchange
USA – Put
the card in your pocket
Japan –
Examine the card and comment on it
In meetings,
put the card on the table in front of you.
It is also
considered polite to give your name card to others with both hands.
2.
Position and
Status
Note gender
inequality! It sucks for the women but do note that women are generally
considered of a lower status than men in some cultures!
Chinese –
Age and hierarchy
Japanese –
The higher the rank of the person you are introduced to, the lower you bow
3.
Electronic
Communication Etiquette
Netiquette
(especially when sending emails, oh god)
Telephone
etiquette (it’s “Hello, this is ABC company. Who are you looking for?” not
“HARLOW ABC COMPANY WHO YOU WAN TOK TO?!”)
4.
Gift-Giving
Wrap and
present the gifts APPROPRIATELY.
USA – Gifts
are opened in front of the giver and appreciation is expressed.
Business
gifts to the office are shared by all, so do note that whatever you get has to
be generic enough.
Flowers – BE
CAREFUL WHAT FLOWERS YOU GET. Colours and types of flowers can have different
meanings in different cultures!
Gift-Giving
in Japan
-
It’s an art!
-
The
wrapping/presenting of the gift are as important as the gift itself.
-
Wrap the
gift beautifully, but don’t bother with ornate bows or decorations.
-
Colour used
must be consistent with the occasion (red/gold/white for happy events,
black/purple/white for other occasions like sad ones).
-
Don’t open
the gift in front of the giver! It’s rude!
-
Don’t
surprise your host with a present.
-
Present your
gift in private; it’s less awkward for the recipient.
-
GOOD gifts
include imported liquor, consumables of high quality, designer-made products,
locally (Japanese)-made products.
-
BAD gifts
include anything made anywhere else in Asia.
LECTURE
ELEVEN
Business and Social Customs:
1.
Greeting/Handshaking
-
When in
doubt, DON’T kiss or hug – your client might mistake you for some sexual
predator =.=”
-
Don’t
attempt to kill your client via handshake (squeezing his/her hand – that shit
hurts!) or imitate a limp noodle (basically limply holding his/her hand –
that’s just sad).
-
A moderately
firm handshake should go down well.
-
Be aware of
gender differences in some cultures (especially if you’re a woman – some
cultures may frown upon contact between men and women, no matter how
professional it is)
2.
Verbal
Expressions
-
Make an
effort to say some basic greetings in the local language (it’ll give your
client a good impression as you’ll come across as someone who actually made an
extra effort). Beware of slang though!
-
Make small
talk, but don’t engage in topics involving politics, religion, salary, personal
life etc. Do note that not all cultures like small talk though.
Chinese: Small talk = GOOD.
Japanese: Small talk = BAD. They prefer
silence.
Americans: Small talk = BAD. It’s seen as
a waste of time.
3.
Male/Female
Relationships and Workplace Equality
-
In Korea,
women don’t hold powerful positions in the government.
-
In Mexico,
bosses greet female supervisor by pecking them on the cheek, but to Asians it
may be seen as sexual harassment.
4.
Humour
in Business
5.
Superstitions
6.
Taboos
(practices or verbal expressions considered by a society to be improper or
unacceptable)
7.
Dress
and Appearance
-
what you
wear sends a nonverbal message about you and your company (and your attitude
towards work!)
-
determine
what attire is customary/acceptable in the environment you are going to
-
be careful
of what colours you are wearing!
8.
Office
Customs and Practices
9.
Customary
Behaviour/Demeanour
10.
Bribery
Note: In
some cultures like ours, bribery is considered unacceptable, but in some other
cultures like Thailand and Indonesia, bribery is considered an unofficial norm.
11.
Special
Foods/Consumption Taboos
Be careful
when hosting people from other cultures – don’t force them to eat something
that they’re uncomfortable with (like how some foreigners dislike durian, so
don’t force them!)
Slang
= Informal, lexical terms used by specific social groups like teenagers. (eg
“buzz off” or “salad dodger” or “stinks”)
Colloquialism
= A word, phrase or paralanguage that is employed in conversational or informal
language but not in formal speech or writing. (eg “gonna”, “wanna”)
Note: Colloquialisms are
considered standard language while slang is not.
Conflict
= Perceived incompatibility of goals, values, expectations, processes or
outcomes.
Conflict
as Opportunity
-
conflict is
seen as a normal, useful process
-
all issues
are subject to change through negotiation, direct confrontation and
conciliation are valued
-
conflict is
a necessary renegotiation of an implied contract (release of tension,
redistribution of opportunity, renewal of relationships)
-
people tend
not to think twice before confrontation
-
usually
found in more INDIVIDUALISTIC cultures
Conflict
as Destructive
-
conflict is
seen as ultimately unproductive for relationships
-
perspective
often rooted in spiritual or cultural values
-
tendency
towards avoidance of confrontation and absence of direct expression of feelings
(people tend to bottle their feelings up more)
-
usually
found in many Asian cultures; more COLLECTIVISTIC cultures
-
think how
Asian cultures generally look for harmony and usually want to save “face”
(criticism is taken personally, so it’s considered a loss of “face”)
Conflict takes on a
dialectical perspective – no one approach to conflict is appropriate in all
situations. Some cultures are more prone to conflict, while others have low
incidence (conflicts tend to be minimised, and they are also dealt with
properly).
Cultural
Differences
Individualism:
-
higher level
of conflict (like segregated communities with high levels of stereotypes and
discrimination – think of Northern Ireland with its Catholics vs Protestants
issue)
-
there is
identity conflict, emotional distance and lack of trust, as well as a
socialisation that tolerates conflict and distrust
Collectivism:
-
lower level
of conflict (more reflection done instead of confrontation)
-
interpersonal
practices that build security and trust, as well as a strong linkage between
individual and community interests
-
preference
for joint problem-solving (decisions are in the hands of the disputers)
-
third
parties made available to facilitate conflict management
-
emphasis
made on the restoration of social harmony
-
strategies
of conflict avoidance
Types
of Conflict
Affective
Conflict = Incompatibility of
feelings/emotions. (eg a girl friendzoning a boy)
Conflict
of Interest = Incompatibility of
preferences for a course of action/plan to pursue (eg you can’t work in another
company without informing your current one – obligations vs personal interest).
It’s like how a teacher can’t teach his/her own child who goes to the same
school that he/she is teaching in.
Value
Conflict = Incompatibility of
ideologies. (The ideologies you were brought up with – for example, are you
pro-abortion or anti-abortion?)
Cognitive
Conflict = Incompatibility of thought
processes (Different POVs, like how 3 days may not mean a lot of time to you,
but to someone else could mean a very long time)
Goal
Conflict = Incompatibility of
preferred outcome (Should you spend your extra money or save it for a rainy
day?)
Styles
Used When Dealing With Conflict
Dominating
Style = high concern for self, low
concern for others. (win-lose strategy: I must win, you must apologise to me
first!)
Integrating
Style = high concern for self and
other, involves open and direct exchange of information in attempt to reach
solution that is acceptable to both parties (requires a LOT of energy – you
want to make sure that both parties are happy with the outcome)
Compromising
Style = moderate degree of concern
for self and other, since both individuals give up something to find a mutually
acceptable solution. (less effective than the integrating style since there is
less commitment to the solution)
Obliging
Style = low concern for self, high
concern for other, normally used if topic of conflict is minor and you value
the relationship more than winning the argument. Differences and
incompatibilities are played down (one person is made to be of a higher status
than the other) and commonalities that satisfy the other party’s concerns are emphasised
(the “I am always sorry” approach is used, but note that resentment may build
up!). Less commitment is paid to the solution.
Avoiding
Style = low concern for both self
and other, viewed negatively in dominant cultural contexts. This approach may
not be good, but it could help depending on the situation – it’s appropriate in
situations where it allows for time to think of a response or if the issue is
trivial. Cooling-off period = GOOD.
Factors
that influence Conflict Management Style
-
Family background
(if a child grows up with his/her parents constantly arguing, he/she may decide
to use the same style when he/she grows up)
-
Gender
-
Ethnicity
-
Value
differences (Individualism vs Collectivism, saving of “face”)
Managing
Conflict
Mediation:
Conflict resolution involving
a third party/intermediary.
-
conflict
transformer will assist disputants to think in new ways (for example, why
exactly are both parties angry?)
-
can be done
on informal basis (settling the problem between the two people and the mediator)
or built into the legal system
-
different
models of mediation used in different cultural contexts
Negotiation:
Depends on individual cultural and personal characteristics.
-
the greater
the difference between cultures, the greater the likelihood that miscommunication
could result in a negative outcome
-
need to
choose appropriate communication strategies in intercultural negotiations
-
understand
who the negotiators are (choose the right people with an appropriate
background!)
-
provide a
conducive environment and if possible, have a local present
Cultural
Noise = Anything that distracts or
interferes with the message being communicated. (eg nonverbal messages like
body language, space and gift-giving)
Power
and Authority
Power
= The ability to influence others.
Authority
= The power to give commands and make final decisions. (how an alliance chooses
to conduct decision-making, strategy-setting and influence over each other)
-
To create a
synergy between global business partners, the firms need to have balanced authority,
which allows each partner to share the decision-making role
-
The alliance
will fall apart if one seeks a superiority advantage, claiming to possess
superior resources or a superior position in the alliance
Environment
of the Negotiation
Home game = more territorial
(assertive) owners
-
when
negotiators are on their home territory, they’re more assertive and may have an
advantage of access to information and human resources
-
host
negotiators may also have a feeling of superiority
-
so choose a
NEUTRAL site, which will eliminate the psychological advantage of the home
ground
-
also take
note of the physical arrangement of the room and atmosphere (eg the seating
arrangement) since certain positions may be considered a higher or lower
ranking
Other
Factors that could affect Intercultural Negotiations
-
Stereotypes
(PCD could affect how you see the people or talk to them, which could lead to
biasness as you both go in with a preconceived notion of each other – eg
Americans may be seen as aggressive or money-minded)
-
Negotiation
Styles (some communities are more high/low-context, so you need to know if they
are more direct or indirect cultures.
LECTURE
TWELVE
Intercultural communication
brings about social change, but needs several components:
-
Innovation
-
that is
communicated through certain channels
-
over time
-
among
members of a social system
-
with certain
effects.
Innovation
as a Cultural Message
Innovation
= An idea or product that is perceived as new.
An intercultural message
would then contain inherently motivating features.
Characteristics:
1.
Relative
Advantage
Degree to
which the innovation appears better than its predecessor (eg Facebook vs
Twitter – which is more convenient to the users?)
2.
Compatibility
Degree to
which innovation is congruent with existing beliefs, attitudes, values and
needs of receivers
3.
Complexity
Extent to
which the innovation appears difficult to understand and use (the simpler the
innovation is, the better it is due to it being easier to adopt)
4.
Trialability
Degree to
which the innovation cam be sampled/tried on a small scale basis
5.
Observability
Degree to
which an innovation can be viewed and scrutinised before actual adoption (the
before and after)
For an idea to be adopted, it
must be:
-
BETTER than
the predecessor
-
CONGRUENT
with existing beliefs
-
SIMPLE
enough to understand
-
TRYABLE on a
small scale basis
-
OBSERVABLE
before actual adoption
Process
of Decision-Making
1.
Knowledge
Stage = Person gains awareness and
some understanding of the innovation
2.
Persuasion
Stage = Person evaluates the
innovation
3.
Decision
Stage = Person runs a small-scale
trial
4.
Implementation
= Person adopts innovation into the existing system
5.
Confirmation
Stage = Person seeks reinforcement
for the innovation decision that has been made
Note that the process is NOT
unidirectional, and these stages may be short-circuited (stopped), compressed
(this prolly means that some stages may occur at the same time) and reversed.
The person may also choose to discontinue the decision at any stage.
Groups
of People according to the Rate of Innovation Adoption
1.
Innovators
(2.5% of population)
-
Venturesome people,
eager to try new ideas
-
Can afford
to take risks (likely to have more $$$ to afford irrational adoptions)
-
Often
deviant from the social system
2.
Early
Adopters (13.5% of population)
-
More
innovative than the majority, but not deviant from community norms
-
Knowledgeable
and respected enough to be a role model of sorts
-
Highest
number of opinion leaders
-
Normally
more highly-educated
3.
Early
Majority (34% of population)
-
Adopt
innovations just before the average people of the social system
-
Not many
leaders from this group
-
More
deliberate in their adoption, they’ll wait for feedback from the early adopters
before making their decision
-
Less educated,
less social mobility
4.
Late
Majority (34% of population)
-
Adopt
innovations just after the average people of the social system
-
Cautious;
Approach innovations with healthy scepticism
-
Will choose
to adopt innovations only after confirmation by the public or group
5.
Final
Adopters (16% of population)
-
The last to
adopt innovations (and some don’t even adopt the innovation)
-
Highly
traditional, they base their decisions on those of previous generations
-
Suspicious
of innovations and change agents
- Negative opinion leaders (generally
senior in age, low socio-economic status)
Factors
Associated with Innovativeness and Change
1.
Communication
Sources
Orientation
outside the social system, media exposure and interpersonal communication
2.
Attitudes
towards Change
3.
Leadership
Status
A person who
perceives himself as an opinion leader typically adopts early
4.
Social/Demographic
Variables
Education,
literacy, previous experience etc
5.
Personality
Characteristics
Empathy,
venturesome, cosmopolitanism, desire to achieve
6.
Economic
Factors
Size of
organisation, high income, loan ability
7.
World
View
Personal or
cultural outlook towards fate can restrain innovativeness
8.
Social-system
Readiness
Some
cultures by nature embrace change more than others
9.
Cultural
Involvement
More
culturally involved people tend to be earlier adopters
10.
Cultural
Cohesion
Cultures
that are highly cohesive tend to adopt as a unit
Change
& Organisations
-
Innovation
and change is prevalent
-
Inevitable
for successful organisations
-
Organisational
culture affects the innovation-and-change process
Organisational
Change is needed when:
-
There’s a
national competition for goods/services
-
Things get
obsolete really fast
-
Productivity
drops
-
Personnel
shifts
-
Morale/Satisfaction
is low
-
There is new
leadership
-
There is
acquisition or relocation
-
A consultant
has completed recommendations
-
There is a
structural/environmental change
-
There is
significant failure
Factors
influencing Organisational Innovativeness & Change
-
The leader
must have a positive attitude towards change
-
Decentralisation
of info-sharing and decision-making must take place (there’s less
innovativeness when power and control is in the hands of only a few)
-
Organisation
members must possess complexity (high level of knowledge and expertise)
-
Organisation
must de-emphasise rules and procedures (there’s less innovativeness when things
are formal; MORE red tape = LESS change)
-
High social
interconnectedness must exist between organisational members (new ideas flow
more rapidly and enhances innovativeness)
Strategies
for Innovation & Change
-
Get close to
the market (know what everyone needs)
-
Presence and
communication of innovative info (consistently emphasise development and
innovation in the organisation as well as make information available)
-
Social
network (need to make contact with gatekeepers, opinion leaders etc)
-
Outside
pressure (strikes, boycotts, legislations etc)
-
Change in
top leaders (organisations change when the top management exercises personal
and corporate change)
-
Job
expectation technique (clarify job expectations among managers, peers and
subordinates)
-
Management
by objectives (management and subordinates participate in setting goals for the
subordinate)
-
Job
enrichment (makes the job more satisfying)
-
Team-building
(provides team members with an opportunity to discuss possibilities for change)
-
Organisational
development (increase organisational effectiveness by connecting individual desires
for growth with organisational goals)
-
Changing the
root metaphor/how the individual understands a situation (change fundamental
assumptions about the organisation and the way people work)
Skills
in Planning for Innovation and Cultural Change
-
Tailor
message to fit cultural roles and past experiences
-
Consider the
needs of the culture/organisation
-
Concentrate
on opinion leaders (grooming)
-
Close the
heterophily gap (the gap between pro-change and anti-change people)
-
Anticipate
and prevent undesirable social consequences of innovation adoption
-
Do a
demographic analysis of the target culture
-
Understand
the use of the mass media
-
Build
bridges, not walls (connect with informal opinion leaders and decision-makers
who will lend credence to the message)
-
Don’t seek
the cultural recluse (they’ll prevent long-range cultural adaptation)
-
Direct
efforts toward members of existing homogeneous units
-
Practise
empathy
Realise that while
innovations are mostly beneficial, some may be harmful
Sorry if the format is a bit screwed up, for some reason I can't change it!
Feel free to use these notes for studying; all the best!
Comments
Post a Comment